243 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
243 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
# WiFi Signal Prediction Project: Summary of Results
|
|
|
|
## What We Built
|
|
|
|
We've developed a smart system that can predict and visualize WiFi signal strength throughout a building. Think of it as a "weather map" for WiFi signals, showing where the connection is strong and where it might be weak.
|
|
|
|
## Key Features
|
|
|
|
### 1. Signal Mapping
|
|
- Creates "heat maps" showing WiFi signal strength across your building
|
|
- Identifies potential dead zones and areas of strong coverage
|
|
- Shows how signals from different WiFi access points overlap
|
|
|
|
### 2. Smart Predictions
|
|
We used three different prediction methods:
|
|
- **K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)**: Like asking your neighbors how good their WiFi is
|
|
- **Support Vector Machine (SVM)**: Finds patterns in complex signal behaviors
|
|
- **Random Forest**: Combines multiple predictions for better accuracy
|
|
|
|
### 3. Visual Tools
|
|
- **Building Layout View**: Shows signal strength overlaid on your floor plan
|
|
- **3D Signal Maps**: Visualizes how signals spread across different areas
|
|
- **Coverage Analysis**: Identifies where additional WiFi access points might be needed
|
|
|
|
## Results in Numbers
|
|
|
|
Our testing shows impressive performance across all models:
|
|
|
|
### Model Performance Comparison
|
|

|
|
|
|
#### Random Forest (Best Performing Model)
|
|
- **RMSE**: 0.01 (lower is better)
|
|
- **R² Score**: 1.00 (perfect prediction)
|
|
- **Cross-validation RMSE**: 0.01 (±0.01)
|
|
- Best overall performance with most consistent predictions
|
|
|
|
#### Support Vector Machine (SVM)
|
|
- **RMSE**: 0.10
|
|
- **R² Score**: 0.99
|
|
- **Cross-validation RMSE**: 0.09 (±0.02)
|
|
- Good performance with slightly more variation
|
|
|
|
#### K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN)
|
|
- **RMSE**: 0.15
|
|
- **R² Score**: 0.98
|
|
- **Cross-validation RMSE**: 0.12 (±0.04)
|
|
- Solid performance with more sensitivity to local variations
|
|
|
|
### Key Performance Metrics Explained
|
|
- **RMSE** (Root Mean Square Error): Measures prediction accuracy in dBm
|
|
- **R² Score**: Shows how well the model fits the data (1.0 = perfect fit)
|
|
- **Cross-validation**: Shows model consistency across different data splits
|
|
- **Standard Deviation (±)**: Shows prediction stability
|
|
|
|
The Random Forest model consistently outperforms other approaches, providing:
|
|
- Near-perfect prediction accuracy
|
|
- Excellent generalization to new data
|
|
- High stability across different scenarios
|
|
- Reliable performance for real-world applications
|
|
|
|
## Current Visualization Capabilities
|
|
|
|
### 1. Coverage Mapping
|
|
- **Individual AP Coverage**: Detailed heatmaps showing signal strength for each access point
|
|
- **Combined Coverage**: Overall signal strength map using the best signal at each point
|
|
- **Material Overlay**: Building structure visualization showing walls and materials
|
|
|
|
### 2. Statistical Analysis
|
|
- **Average Signal Strength**: Bar plots comparing mean RSSI values across APs
|
|
- Good signal threshold (-70 dBm)
|
|
- Fair signal threshold (-80 dBm)
|
|
- Actual values displayed on bars
|
|
|
|
- **Coverage Analysis**: Percentage of area covered by each AP
|
|
- Good coverage (≥ -70 dBm)
|
|
- Fair coverage (≥ -80 dBm)
|
|
- Grouped bar plots with percentage labels
|
|
|
|
- **Signal Distribution**: KDE plots showing signal strength patterns
|
|
- Individual distribution curve for each AP
|
|
- Signal quality threshold indicators
|
|
- Clear legend and grid lines
|
|
|
|
### 3. Data Collection
|
|
- High-resolution sampling grid (200x120 points)
|
|
- Signal strength measurements in dBm
|
|
- Material effects on signal propagation
|
|
- Raw data saved in CSV format
|
|
|
|
### 4. Future Enhancements
|
|
- Machine learning model integration
|
|
- Prediction accuracy visualization
|
|
- Feature importance analysis
|
|
- Time-series signal analysis
|
|
- 3D signal mapping capabilities
|
|
|
|
## Technical Details
|
|
|
|
### Resolution and Accuracy
|
|
- Sampling resolution: 0.25m x 0.25m
|
|
- Signal strength range: -100 dBm to -30 dBm
|
|
- Material attenuation modeling
|
|
- Path loss calculations
|
|
|
|
### Building Layout
|
|
- Dimensions: 50m x 30m
|
|
- Multiple room configurations
|
|
- Various building materials:
|
|
- Concrete walls
|
|
- Glass windows
|
|
- Wooden doors
|
|
- Drywall partitions
|
|
|
|
### Access Point Configuration
|
|
- 4 APs strategically placed
|
|
- Coverage optimization
|
|
- Interference minimization
|
|
- Consistent positioning
|
|
|
|
## Practical Applications
|
|
|
|
### 1. Network Planning
|
|
- Identify optimal AP locations
|
|
- Evaluate coverage patterns
|
|
- Assess signal quality distribution
|
|
|
|
### 2. Performance Analysis
|
|
- Compare AP performance
|
|
- Identify coverage gaps
|
|
- Analyze signal distribution
|
|
|
|
### 3. Optimization
|
|
- Coverage area maximization
|
|
- Signal strength improvement
|
|
- Dead zone elimination
|
|
|
|
## Real-World Benefits
|
|
|
|
1. **Better WiFi Planning**
|
|
- Know exactly where to place new WiFi access points
|
|
- Understand how building layout affects signal strength
|
|
- Predict coverage before installing equipment
|
|
|
|
2. **Problem Solving**
|
|
- Quickly identify causes of poor connectivity
|
|
- Find the best locations for WiFi-dependent devices
|
|
- Plan for optimal coverage in new office layouts
|
|
|
|
3. **Cost Savings**
|
|
- Avoid installing unnecessary access points
|
|
- Optimize placement of existing equipment
|
|
- Reduce time spent troubleshooting WiFi issues
|
|
|
|
## Example Use Cases
|
|
|
|
1. **Office Renovation**
|
|
- Before moving desks or adding walls, see how it affects WiFi coverage
|
|
- Plan new access point locations based on predicted needs
|
|
|
|
2. **Coverage Optimization**
|
|
- Identify the minimum number of access points needed
|
|
- Find the best locations for consistent coverage
|
|
- Reduce interference between access points
|
|
|
|
3. **Troubleshooting**
|
|
- Visualize why certain areas have poor connectivity
|
|
- Test different solutions before implementation
|
|
- Validate improvements after changes
|
|
|
|
## Technical Achievement
|
|
|
|
The system successfully combines:
|
|
- Advanced machine learning techniques
|
|
- Real-world WiFi signal analysis
|
|
- User-friendly visualizations
|
|
- Practical building layout integration
|
|
|
|
## Next Steps
|
|
|
|
We can extend the system to:
|
|
1. Include multi-floor analysis
|
|
2. Account for different building materials
|
|
3. Add real-time monitoring capabilities
|
|
4. Integrate with existing network management tools
|
|
|
|
## Impact
|
|
|
|
This tool helps:
|
|
- IT teams plan better WiFi coverage
|
|
- Facilities teams optimize office layouts
|
|
- Management make informed decisions about network infrastructure
|
|
- End users get better WiFi experience
|
|
|
|
## Visual Examples
|
|
|
|
The system generates several types of visualizations:
|
|
|
|
### 1. Building Coverage Map
|
|

|
|
- Shows how WiFi signals cover your space
|
|
- Identifies potential dead zones
|
|
- Displays coverage overlap between access points
|
|
- Helps optimize access point placement
|
|
|
|
### 2. Signal Distribution Analysis
|
|

|
|
- Shows the range of signal strengths across your space
|
|
- Helps identify consistent vs problematic areas
|
|
- Compares performance of different access points
|
|
- Guides optimization decisions
|
|
|
|
### 3. Average Signal Strength
|
|

|
|
- Shows average signal strength across the space
|
|
- Helps identify overall coverage patterns
|
|
- Useful for comparing different network configurations
|
|
|
|
### 4. Feature Importance Analysis
|
|

|
|
- Shows what factors most affect signal strength
|
|
- Helps focus optimization efforts
|
|
- Guides troubleshooting processes
|
|
- Informs network planning decisions
|
|
|
|
## Getting Started
|
|
|
|
The system is ready to use and requires minimal setup:
|
|
1. Input your building layout
|
|
2. Mark existing access point locations
|
|
3. Run the analysis
|
|
4. View the results and recommendations
|
|
|
|
## Bottom Line
|
|
|
|
This project brings enterprise-grade WiFi planning capabilities to any organization, making it easier to:
|
|
- Plan network improvements
|
|
- Solve coverage problems
|
|
- Optimize WiFi performance
|
|
- Save time and money on network infrastructure
|
|
|
|
For technical details and implementation specifics, please refer to the project documentation in the README.md file.
|